obv the water... everyone said it so i dont gotta. what i love is the implied hair/waterdroplet. And i DEF think that you need to resolve the drops themselves. they need to be bigger and i think that the hair/droplet's downward facing point should cut deeper. really break below the 2 heads, a graceful curve and bigger droplet.... then see if you even need ripples (imply them?)
9 comments:
I like it!
but maybe try to simplify the water wave? and also maybe you just need one drop instead of two?
Well Done illustration. I get the purity from it.
I would simplify the water drops and make the cross thicker (line weight). Otherwise, very good.
I like the way the water looks but I could see it more simplified as well. I agree that the cross should be heavier in weight. But very nice.
obv the water... everyone said it so i dont gotta. what i love is the implied hair/waterdroplet. And i DEF think that you need to resolve the drops themselves. they need to be bigger and i think that the hair/droplet's downward facing point should cut deeper. really break below the 2 heads, a graceful curve and bigger droplet.... then see if you even need ripples (imply them?)
yes, i agree with myself. and doubly-so! that droplet should cut deeper below the chinline. remember: graceful curve.
I think the cross could be a thicker stoke and same with the top of the head, i think that would balance out the face being all dark
something to consider
Maybe try the ripples at the bottom in a heavier stroke. Nothing too extreme, but slightly thicker could look good.
I like the Mucha-esque ladies. Have you tried using flame (which is also a sign of purification)?
Post a Comment